Beyond the Australian Standard – Is there a better contract for the delivery of public infrastructure?

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ipweaqbackup.intersearch.com.au/ipweaqjspui/handle/1/7261

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Rochester, Michael	-
dc.date.accessioned	2021-10-21T09:50:22Z	-
dc.date.available	2021-10-21T09:50:22Z	-
dc.date.copyright	2021	en_US
dc.date.issued	2021	-
dc.identifier.uri	https://webcast.gigtv.com.au/Mediasite/Channel/admin-ipweaq-annual-conference-2021/watch/6e65ffac597d49c9949408e8e75729361d	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://ipweaq.intersearch.com.au/ipweaqjspui/handle/1/7261	-
dc.description.abstract	Statistics show that around 85% of projects are delivered using an Australian Standard contract. However as local government projects become more sophisticated many are looking at other contracting models from other states such as New South Wales’ GC21, or from overseas with the NEC or FIDIC. This presentation will look at some of these other forms and their appropriateness for local government projects and whether there is a better contract for infrastructure delivery.	en_US
dc.publisher	Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia Queensland	en_US
dc.subject	Infrastructure Legislation	en_US
dc.title	Beyond the Australian Standard – Is there a better contract for the delivery of public infrastructure?	en_US
dc.type	Audio Visual Recording	en_US
Appears in Collections:	2021 Annual Conference, Cairns - Presentations

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
Beyond the Australian Standard – Is there a better contract for the delivery of public infrastructure_.mp4		1.14 GB	Unknown	View/Open
5.3_Michael Rochester.pdf		205.24 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open