Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ipweaqbackup.intersearch.com.au/ipweaqjspui/handle/1/3080Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | McCullough Robertson | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-01T00:47:11Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-11-01T00:47:11Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016 | en_US |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ipweaq.intersearch.com.au/ipweaqjspui/handle/1/3080 | - |
| dc.description | Article | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | LOCAL GOVERNMENT: CHAIN of Responsibility Act. Environmental clean-up costs can now rest with ‘significant’ financial beneficiaries of a project, even where they don’t have site access or an influence over the activities. They can rest with someone who in the past two years has been in a position to influence environmental compliance, and they can climb the corporate tree. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia Queensland | en_US |
| dc.subject | Chain of Responsibility Act | en_US |
| dc.title | Chain of Responsibility | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Legal/Regulatory/Management | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| McCullough Roberson Article June 2016.pdf | Article | 238.53 kB | Adobe PDF |  View/Open |
Items in the Knowledge Centre are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.